Rethinking UX Maturity: A Living System, Not Just a Ladder
Why UX Maturity Isn’t a Ladder —
It’s a Loop
The Problem with Ladder Thinking
Many organizations treat UX maturity as a series of stages: climb from
"Emergent" to "Structured" and on toward "User‑driven."
But this linear view can lead to unhealthy behaviors—chasing the next stage
without deepening what already works, getting demotivated by setbacks, or
relying on superficial rituals instead of system-wide thinking.
UX Maturity as a Living System
Instead, Kaplan argues for viewing maturity as an ecosystem that demands
continuous nurturing:
- Growth
is nonlinear teams evolve at different rates in areas like culture,
strategy, process, and outcomes.
- You
can’t just “level up”; you must tend to structures, rituals, and
alignment across the organization.
- Healthy
systems are resilient—able to withstand leadership change, shifting
priorities, or reorganizations.
Learning from Case Studies:
- Regression
after leadership turnover due to lack of structural support.
- Plateau
disguised as stability from unchecked habits.
- Obsessing
over “stage advancement” led to superficial maturity.
- Grassroots
growth from reflection and lightweight shifts inside teams—without
top-down mandates.
Highly recommend reading the full piece by Kate Kaplan at NN/g to rethink how you approach UX maturity.
Original Article Link -- UX
Maturity Is a Living System, Not a Ladder - NN/g
What Inspires Me Here & My Opinion
When we talk about UX maturity, many people imagine it as a ladder. Step one, then step two, and eventually, the “top level.” But real-world UX maturity doesn’t work that way. It’s not a climb—it’s a living system.
Why the Ladder View Doesn’t Work
The ladder mindset often creates pressure to “move up” without strengthening what already exists. This can lead to:
-
Teams plateauing with rituals but no real reflection
-
Progress being lost when leadership changes
-
Stage-chasing instead of meaningful growth
UX Maturity as a Living Ecosystem
Instead of a ladder, think of UX maturity as an ecosystem:
-
Growth is uneven—different areas develop at different speeds
-
Balance matters—maturity isn’t about speed, it’s about depth
-
Care is essential—systems need nurturing to survive shifts
Lessons from Real Teams
-
Weak foundations crumble when leaders move on
-
Repeated routines without reflection create false maturity
-
Obsession with “levels” dilutes real impact
-
Small, grassroots changes often spark lasting transformation
Key Takeaway
UX maturity is not a milestone—it’s a system that needs care. Ask not “What stage are we at?” but “How healthy is our UX ecosystem?”
👉 What do you think? Do you see UX maturity as a climb or a system in your organization?
Comments
Post a Comment